Role of the Legal Aid Review Panels (LARP)
The Legal Aid Review Panels (LARP) were established following amendments to the Legal Aid Commission Act 1979 (NSW) on 8 February 2024, aimed at modernising and streamlining the process for managing appeals against refusals or termination of a grant of legal aid. LARP aims to enhance efficiency, ensure transparency, and improve responsiveness in the appeal process, providing greater clarity in decision-making.
LARP are responsible for hearing and determining appeals to Legal Aid NSW.
- For appeals involving complex questions of law or policy – a Legal Aid Review Panel will comprise at least two members.
- For other appeals – a Legal Aid Review Panel will consist of one member from the pool.
In reaching their decisions, Panel members are required to adhere to Legal Aid NSW policies and guidelines, upholding consistency and fairness across all determinations.
Panel member roles and responsibilities
Panel members play a crucial role in ensuring the independence and fairness of the appeal process. Below is an outline of their key responsibilities.
Key duties
Document review
Panel members are responsible for thoroughly reviewing the LARC Report and all supporting materials submitted for each appeal. This includes reviewing the internal review decisions and any additional evidence provided by the appellant or Legal Aid NSW.
Decision-making
In making their decision, panel members must conduct a comprehensive review of all the material submitted for each appeal. This includes the LARP Report and all supporting materials including the internal review decisions and any additional evidence provided by the appellant or Legal Aid NSW.
Panel members must make independent decisions based on the review of documents, applying the means test, merit test, and other eligibility criteria established by Legal Aid NSW.
Timely completion
Panel members are required to complete their reviews within 14 days of receiving an appeal. This ensures efficiency in decision making and supports timely outcomes for clients.
Adherence to policies
Panel members must comply with the Legal Aid NSW eligibility policies and guidelines, including criteria for means and merit tests, and the types of matters for which legal aid is available.
Confidentiality and conflict of interest
Panel members must adhere to strict standards of confidentiality, ensuring that all case information remains confidential. They must also disclose any conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from appeals where a conflict arises.
Impartiality and professionalism
Panel members must approach each case impartially and professionally, ensuring that decisions are made on the merits of the case without external influence.
Decision-making guidelines
Panel members are tasked with ensuring that all decisions align with Legal Aid NSW’s eligibility policies and maintain a fair, transparent, and consistent approach. The following guidelines outline best practices for making decisions in the appeals process.
Means Test
Assess the applicant’s financial situation to ensure they meet the means test criteria for legal aid. This includes evaluating the applicant’s income, assets, and any deductions, ensuring compliance with the current thresholds set by Legal Aid NSW.
Merit Test
Evaluate the merit of the appeal based on the facts of the case and the likelihood of success. This may involve reviewing the complexity of the legal issues involved and the potential impact of the appeal. Panel members should apply the Legal Aid NSW merit test guidelines to determine whether the matter warrants legal aid.
Types of matters
Ensure that the appeal falls within the types of matters for which legal aid is available. Panel members should confirm that the appeal is related to a legal issue within the scope of the policies set by Legal Aid NSW.
For more information, see Policy Online.
Standardised approach
Panel members should apply consistent criteria across all cases to ensure fairness and transparency. This includes adhering to all Legal Aid NSW policies and guidelines when evaluating each appeal.
Rational decision-making
Decisions should be based on facts, law, and policy, without external influence or bias. Panel members should provide clear, well-supported reasoning for their decisions to maintain transparency and accountability.
Handling complex cases
For cases that raise complex questions of law or policy, two panel members should collaborate, ensuring that all relevant factors are considered and a well-informed decision is made.
Documenting the decision
Panel members must thoroughly document their decisions in the LARP Resolution Report, providing clear explanations for the final outcome (Allowed, Deferred, or Disallowed). This ensures that the decision is transparent and can be reviewed if necessary.
Timely reporting
Ensure that decisions are documented and submitted within the required timeframes. Panel members should submit their decisions in a timely manner to allow for the efficient processing of client outcome letters.
Ethical considerations
Ensure that decisions are made independently, free from external pressures or personal bias. Panel members must be impartial, reviewing each case based solely on its merits.
All case materials and decisions must be kept confidential, and panel members must protect the integrity of the process by refraining from discussing cases outside the official review channels.
Appeals process overview
The appeals process involves several stages, ensuring fairness and transparency. Below is an outline of the key stages from internal review to independent review, with a focus on the role of the Legal Aid Review Panels (LARP).
Initial decision
A client’s application for legal aid is initially assessed by Legal Aid NSW. If the application is refused, the client may appeal the decision within 21 days.
Internal review
If a client lodges an appeal, the matter first goes through an internal review within Legal Aid NSW, where the original decision is reassessed by an officer other than the original decision maker.
Outcome
If the original refusal is upheld, a redetermination refusal letter is issued to the client and the matter is referred to LARP. If the appeal is allowed, a grant of aid is issued.
LARP provides an independent review of the appeal, ensuring impartiality and adherence to policies.
LARP's role
LARP members are responsible for reviewing the LARP Report and supporting documentation, including any internal review decisions.
Panel members assess whether the internal decision was correct based on the criteria set out in Legal Aid NSW's client eligibility policies, including the means test, merit test, and other relevant policies.
LARP can either allow, defer, or disallow the appeal. If deferred, the matter is returned to the LARP Secretariat for further information.
Final decision
Once LARP has reviewed the appeal, the decision is returned to the LARP Secretariat for processing.
Allowed or disallowed
If the appeal is allowed or disallowed, the client outcome letter is issued, and Legal Aid NSW is notified of the decision.
Deferred
If the matter is deferred, the client and Legal Aid NSW are notified that additional information is required before a decision can be made.
Key points in LARP’s involvement
LARP is tasked with conducting an independent review of the appeal, ensuring that the decision-making process aligns with Legal Aid NSW's eligibility criteria.
Timeframe for LARP
Panel members are required to complete their review within 14 days of receiving the case, ensuring timely resolution.
The final decision is communicated to the client and Legal Aid NSW promptly, ensuring efficiency, consistency and transparency in the appeals process.
Share with
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn