These guidelines are intended to be read with the criminal law policies. The guidelines provide guidance on how certain policies are to be applied by setting out certain requirements which need to be observed when determining applications and administering grants of legal aid.
When considering whether an applicant for legal aid satisfies the Merit Test in an appeal before the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, the determining officer should take into consideration that the Court may dismiss the appeal on the basis of the proviso in the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6.
When considering whether an applicant for legal aid satisfies the Merit Test to respond to an appeal under the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F or to respond to a crown sentence appeal in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, the determining officer should take into consideration that there is a presumption of merit on the basis that there is a judgment or order that is favourable to the applicant and is the subject of the appeal brought by another party to the proceedings.
Legal aid is available to an applicant who has been charged with breaches of both Commonwealth and state criminal laws.
Legal Aid NSW will administer the grant of aid as follows:
Note: When assessing the status of a matter, a matter that is prosecuted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions is taken to be essentially a Commonwealth matter.
Exceptional circumstances under Criminal law policy 2.1 Local Court may include (but is not limited to) the following:
An applicant is 'at special disadvantage' if:
An applicant for aid is at special disadvantage if they are:
Applying the 'at special disadvantage' test
The determination about whether the applicant satisfies the 'at special disadvantage' test must be made in the context of legally aided clients generally. In other words, a practitioner certifying that an applicant is 'at special disadvantage' must be satisfied that the applicant's circumstances are exceptional when considered against other legally aided clients. For applicants to be deemed 'at special disadvantage', they must satisfy the two limbs of the test: that is, they must have substantial difficulty dealing with the legal system because of a substantial disability.
An example of where a matter may raise an issue of civil liberties is in circumstances where the applicant for aid has made a complaint or an allegation of an abuse of power by a person in a special position of authority (eg. a police officer) and Legal Aid NSW is satisfied that the offence with which the applicant is charged has arisen as a direct result of that alleged abuse of power and that the complaint or allegation is indicative of a systemic abuse of power.
This will generally only arise in traffic matters.
Legal Aid NSW will be satisfied there are exceptional circumstances where the applicant for legal aid is an Aboriginal woman.
This will generally only arise in traffic matters.
Legal Aid NSW will be satisfied there are exceptional circumstances where the applicant for legal aid is a defendant charged with a domestic violence offence and Legal Aid NSW is satisfied that the applicant is a victim of domestic violence.
The above list is not intended to be exhaustive: there may be other types of circumstances that Legal Aid NSW may take into consideration in deciding whether there are exceptional circumstances. This may include, for example, where the applicant for aid:
Where an application for legal aid is received within 14 days of the date set down for the hearing of the matter, legal aid is only available in exceptional circumstances.
In deciding whether there are exceptional circumstances in cases where there has been a late application for a Local Court defended matter, Legal Aid NSW will consider the following as being exceptional circumstances:
Legal Aid NSW would then only grant aid if the legal practitioner applying on behalf of the applicant provides Legal Aid NSW with all the relevant documentation necessary to make a determination to grant aid.
If an application for legal aid for a criminal trial is received within 30 days before the trial is due to commence the legal practitioner for the legal aid applicant must:
See Rule 45 of the New South Wales Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 2013 (NSW) (Solicitors' Rules).
Where an application for legal aid is received within 14 days of the date set down for the hearing of the matter, legal aid is only available in exceptional circumstances.
In deciding whether there are exceptional circumstances in cases where there has been a late application for legal aid in a District Court appeal, Legal Aid NSW will consider the following as being exceptional circumstances:
Legal Aid NSW would then only grant aid if the legal practitioner applying on behalf of the applicant provides Legal Aid NSW with all the relevant documentation necessary to make a determination to grant aid.
Where an application for legal aid is received within 14 days of the date set down for the hearing of the matter, legal aid is only available in exceptional circumstances.
In deciding whether there are exceptional circumstances in cases where there has been a late application under s 91 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), Legal Aid NSW will consider the following as being exceptional circumstances:
Legal Aid NSW would then only grant aid if the practitioner applying on behalf of the applicant provides Legal Aid NSW with all the relevant documentation necessary to make a determination to grant aid.
The following guidelines apply to grants of legal aid in committal matters.
Where the legal aid applicant is seeking a grant of legal aid to:
the costs of providing legal aid will be reimbursed to Legal Aid NSW in accordance with Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), s293.
When assessing an applicant's eligibility under the Means Test, any of the applicant's assets that are covered by a restraining order or confiscation order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) are to be disregarded (see Means Test 5.5: Excluded assets).
If an application is received for legal aid where the applicant's assets are restrained under the Proceeds of Crimes Act 2002 (Cth), the legal practitioner must inform Grants, Legal Aid NSW as soon as possible.
Note: If the matter is a civil matter under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) see Civil law guideline 4.10.
Where the legal aid applicant is seeking a grant of legal aid to:
then Legal Aid NSW requires the applicant request the NSW Crime Commission release restrained funds to pay their legal costs. If no request for release of funds has been made, then the application for legal aid will be refused.
If the request to the NSW Crime Commission for release of funds has been unsuccessful, Legal Aid NSW requires the applicant make an application to the Supreme Court pursuant to s 10B(3)(b) of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW) for the release of restrained funds for legal costs. If there has been no application to the Supreme Court, then the application for legal aid will be refused.
The applicant may apply for legal aid if the Supreme Court refuses to release restrained funds for legal costs. When assessing an applicant’s eligibility under the Means Test restrained assets are to be disregarded.
If an application is received for legal aid where the applicant's assets are restrained under the Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989 (NSW) and other legislation relating to tainted monies/property, the legal practitioner must inform Grants, Legal Aid NSW as soon as possible.
Note: Legal aid is not available for proceedings under the Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989 (NSW) and other legislation relating to tainted monies/property (which includes the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW)) - see Criminal law policy 2.10 when legal aid is not available for criminal matters and Civil law policy 4.21 Matters for which legal aid is not available.
When considering whether it is appropriate that the applicant has legal representation at a restorative justice conference such as a Youth Justice Conference, Community Conference or Circle Sentencing conference, Legal Aid NSW will take into account one or more of the following:
The definition of a ‘term of imprisonment' includes:
When assessing whether an application involves an “appropriate expenditure of limited public funds” Legal Aid NSW needs to consider whether the costs involved in providing legal aid are warranted by the likely benefit to the applicant or, in some circumstances, the community.
Legal Aid NSW needs to be satisfied that the matter for which legal aid is sought is an appropriate expenditure of public legal aid funds.
Legal Aid NSW will only consider that it is an appropriate expenditure of limited public funds in a sentence appeal to the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal (not crown appeals) where:
OR
Legal Aid NSW is satisfied there are exceptional circumstances. Legal Aid NSW may be satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances where:
Share with
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn